Practice process

Hello people

                In this ocation i want to talk about the problematic in the management of the practice process done for the department of psychology in the Uch.

                In very hallway conversation with mates of generation of the career, particularly those that want to do his practice in the clinical section, I listened, and feeling too, very critics about the practice process. The most mentioned, and the most general, is about the ‘timing’ considered by the administration for the process. Much of the thing that we have to do is limited to a space of some weeks; particularly, the selection of practice centers is something that we have to do in a week. This, in addition, is even problematic because the knowing of the different centers of practice was mentioned in the same week.

                Furthermore, I verified other problematic in the administration of the process, in the question of the capacity process centers. This problematic is related to the different centers and his relation with the lines of clinical perspective; so, for the psychoanalytic perspective, for example, existed only one quota for the Hospital San Juan de Dios. This generates very expectancy in all that have to want to do the process in this area.  Also, the information of the different center and his work method will give to us later of the process in self.

                Finally, the getting of a quota in a center; or in a guidance teacher or thesis; is very irregular. This is because in the induction explication of the practice process was mentioned that the student can gain a quota in, for an example, a practice, by a conversation with the different teachers (in out of period process); but, also exist a regular way, that consider an interview, to gain a quota in the centers of practice.

               

In synthesis, the process is a little irregular.